zen0s wroteAnalytical thinking is fundamental. Risk is expressed as likelihood x impact. Likelihood is EXTREMELY low. The impact is not high because relative to an ICE vehicle, replacement of the most major component (the engine) is similar (if not more) in cost. That puts the impact relative to ICE (which is what this discussion is about) as moderate at best.Reading is fundamental, but comprehension is key. You’re throwing out a 2% replacement rate like it magically eliminates the issue of massive costs when batteries do fail. That 2% still represents thousands of people stuck with a repair bill that can rival the price of a new car. Stop cherry-picking stats to downplay legitimate concerns.
But yea, sure, let’s abandon EVs because there’s a less than 2% chance that a major component will fail. For reference, here’s a $46,000 engine replacement on an M6 (not exactly a notably reliable engine):
https://www.reddit.com/r/Justrolledintotheshop/comments/ppkb5d/cost_of_an_m6_motor_replacement_under_warranty/